Tuesday, October 27, 2009

How bizarre, how bizarre

New Zealanders love a good protest march. Out on the streets, banner in hand, chanting this, that and the other. Alright - so maybe we don't all get out and march, but we all enjoy a wee nostalgia trip down Memory Lane. But now the 87.6% of New Zealanders who voted in the smacking referendum are being called on to show their anger and frustration at the total disregard for democracy in this country. Some businessman is fronting up $450,000 for the march, which is a lot of money to spend on banners and refreshments for the troops. I bet around half of that covers Simon Barnett's appearance fee.

But anyway, it's about democracy! The people want to be heard! They want action! They want to be able to smack their kids if they damn well want to! But will the users of Your Views march? Will you march to support action on the smacking referendum?

Yelspal (Epsom)
Does anybody else see irony in the half-wits announcing a march for the right to beat children on the same day some of Nia Glassie's murderers launch an appeal against their sentences?

Yes, I see the irony. But ouch, comparing child murderers with middle New Zealand? Dodgy territory...

Bonny Le Grice (Papatoetoe)
How bizarre that people want to march for the right to hit other people.

Followed by...

JC (Avonhead)
How bizzare that some people living in a so-called democratic country advocate not listening to the voice of 87% of the population.

(How bizarre, how bizarre! Another nostalgic reminisce!)
Technically JC, it wasn't the 'voice' of 87% of the population. Only 1,682,717 votes were cast, so it's actually only 87.6% of that. Estimates of NZ's current population lie around 4,315,800. You do the math!

Doc (Riccarton)
Wish I was there to march on two counts. To protest against politicians interfering in my family's business and also for ignoring the very substantial vote.
Blathering on about petition wording is a red herring. People knew full well what they were voting on. Don't insult us.
As for the stupid comment about smacking being violence - its crappy thinking like that that creates little monsters who have no respect, no manners, no idea of right and wrong and that do not understand that bad behaviour has consequences for themeslves and others. Smacking leads to better citizens and less violence.

Gosh, how could anyone confuse smacking and violence? They're clearly two different things. Doc has outlined it explicitly for us. Smack your kids and they'll be better for it. Harden up New Zealand!

But in all seriousness, anyone want to organise a counter-march? We don't need $450,000, my Mum's got a couple of tins of red paint and we'll just need to get hold of some old bedsheets.

2 comments:

alex said...

Hell yeah. I love a good counter-march, it's the best blend of politics and sport. I'm lost for words as to what I could write on the signs, though. 'learn to read and stop hitting your kids while you're at it'?

Oh, sure, 'learn to read' is a bit unfair, but 'learn to read through the lines if all you choose to read is the Herald' would require a billboard on sticks...

Taryn said...

hmmm counter march? i imagine it could fuel their crazy 'parents right to violence' agenda. like the left wingers who declined to counter march against the national front in wellington last weekend for fear of giving them more attention. I didn't even know the national front was marching. and coincidentally want to buy eastern european mail order brides to further the whites only compound in canterbury. and have started vigilante patrols in New Brighton. anyway....

it is interesting to see though, a good number of the your views comments saying 'get over it' when a couple of years ago it would have been a very different story. people get over things i guess (mostly)